The consequences of counterterrorism laws and policies on humanitarian action have been widely debated and discussed. Indeed, in recent years, members of the humanitarian community have become increasingly aware of the real, perceived, and potential impact of such measures on the delivery of principled humanitarian assistance. Yet, humanitarian organizations continue to experience the effect of counterterrorism measures on their work, often causing a “chilling effect” on humanitarian assistance.
On 12 May, Jessica S. Burniske and Naz K. Modirzadeh will present their recently published pilot empirical study on the impact of counterterrorism laws on humanitarian action as part of the Counterterrorism and Humanitarian Engagement (CHE) Project at the Harvard Law School (HLS) Program on International Law and Armed Conflict (PILAC). The event will explore the key findings of this survey-based study, providing a policy analysis of the results, and followed by an opportunity for questions from the audience.
Join this first session of PHAP’s Advanced Practitioner Series, a series of online sessions for humanitarian and legal practitioners seeking a more in-depth understanding of laws and policies related to the humanitarian protection and assistance in both conflict and disaster contexts.
Read more about this session and register now at https://phap.org/12may2017